Team | W | L | PREV | Comments | |
1 | Atlanta | 30 | 10 | 2 | Taking back the top spot with elite play across the board |
2 | Cincinnati | 28 | 12 | 16 | New owner has the team playing their best for sure |
3 | Houston | 24 | 16 | 4 | Living up to the hype this season, offense is great |
4 | Dover | 23 | 17 | 1 | Putting up good numbers still, so can't count them out |
5 | Arizona | 24 | 16 | 8 | Offense is firing and the pitching is holding its own |
6 | San Juan | 23 | 17 | 5 | Pitching mediocre so far, but offense getting it done |
7 | Boston | 25 | 15 | 7 | Steady combination of good pitching and hitting so far |
8 | Charlotte | 23 | 17 | 6 | Playing well so far, looks like another strong season |
9 | Florida | 23 | 17 | 11 | Getting it done so far, yet numbers not quite elite yet |
10 | Buffalo | 23 | 17 | 14 | Pitching is really good, but offense a slight question mark |
11 | Salt Lake City | 24 | 16 | 15 | League's top pitching so far has them moving up quickly |
12 | Ottawa | 24 | 16 | 22 | Big jump, thanks to well balanced pitching and hitting |
13 | Trenton | 22 | 18 | 23 | Offense has been solid, pitching is just ok |
14 | Pittsburgh | 21 | 19 | 12 | Surprisingly high ERA for them, but still in contention |
15 | Pawtucket | 18 | 22 | 3 | Pitching has been roughed up early on, but they're good |
16 | Louisville | 19 | 21 | 13 | Getting a ton of offense, but giving up a lot of runs too |
17 | St. Louis | 19 | 21 | 17 | Numbers show they could make a move up later on |
18 | Austin | 21 | 19 | 21 | Better than expected start for them is a good sign |
19 | Texas | 21 | 19 | 27 | Pitching has been the key to their over .500 start |
20 | Colorado Springs | 17 | 23 | 19 | A little slump at the end, but numbers are pretty good |
21 | New York | 20 | 20 | 25 | Offense is a bit of a concern, but .500 record is good sign |
22 | Syracuse | 20 | 20 | 26 | Pitching hasn't been great, but they are decent overall |
23 | Durham | 19 | 21 | 20 | Offense is going to have to step it up to get back in it |
24 | Jacksonville | 17 | 23 | 24 | Pitching has been respectable, but not much offense yet |
25 | Tampa Bay | 15 | 25 | 9 | Rough start, but certainly capable of improving |
26 | Los Angeles | 15 | 25 | 10 | Pitching hasn't gotten fully into gear yet, it looks like |
27 | Albuquerque | 15 | 25 | 30 | Rebuild is coming allong, the offense is pretty good |
28 | Salem | 17 | 23 | 32 | Pitching still isn't at the level to move them forward |
29 | Las Vegas | 15 | 25 | 18 | Haven't gotten much offense yet this season |
30 | Seattle | 15 | 25 | 29 | Not getting the pitching numbers you'd expect for Seattle |
31 | Philadelphia | 10 | 30 | 31 | It just hasn't come together for them quite yet |
32 | San Francisco | 10 | 30 | 28 | Pitching is surprisingly bad, and very little offense |
Monday, July 28, 2014
Season 24 Power Rankings #1
A little late with these, my apologies! Here's the power rankings for Season 24 through game 40.
Thursday, July 10, 2014
Season 24 Preseason Power Rankings
Season 24 is about to get under way, so it's time to check in with the preseason power rankings! We had some excellent preseason insights from topoftheworl as well, that were quality additions to the blog. Let's see how they compare! At the top of the preseason rankings, we have the 3-time defending champion Dover. The roster is a year older, but the same was said last season, and they came through. Gotta show respect for the champs. Coming in at #2 is Atlanta, probably the most talented team in Cobbfather on paper. Another impressive season seems extremely likely. #3 is Pawtucket, who emerged last season as a top AL team. With the top offensive threat in the world and some quality Free Agent signings, it's not hard to see why. #4 is Houston, who struck it big in Free Agency once again and looks to be loaded. An upcoming San Juan team rounds out the top 5, as rawdk looks to have his team ready to contend again. Here are the complete rankings, good luck to all in your openers!
Season 23 | ||||
Team | W | L | Comments | |
1 | Dover | 107 | 55 | Getting older, but can 3peat champs be anywhere else? |
2 | Atlanta | 108 | 54 | Extremely talented roster that could easily win it all |
3 | Pawtucket | 92 | 70 | Coming off a great season, and active in Free Agency |
4 | Houston | 87 | 75 | Loaded up in FA once again, so should be solid |
5 | San Juan | 90 | 72 | They've got a lot of youth, so should improve again |
6 | Charlotte | 98 | 64 | Great last season, but the AL is looking very tough |
7 | Boston | 96 | 66 | Aging roster and lost Almanzar, but still pretty good |
8 | Arizona | 88 | 74 | Looked good last season, and should be in it again |
9 | Tampa Bay | 89 | 73 | Haselman is getting older, but still a very good team here |
10 | Los Angeles | 88 | 74 | Always in the mix with tremendous pitching staff |
11 | Florida | 86 | 76 | Should build on last season, Leiter was a nice add |
12 | Pittsburgh | 86 | 76 | Consisitently solid and looking to get back in the fold |
13 | Louisville | 87 | 75 | Nice offense, if the pitching improves, will be strong |
14 | Buffalo | 85 | 77 | Loss of Hernandez hurts, but have very good pitching |
15 | Salt Lake City | 81 | 81 | Looking to break out of the pack this season |
16 | Cincinnati | 78 | 84 | Added a couple of pieces, so they could improve |
17 | St. Louis | 81 | 81 | Very strong pitching is a plus, we'll see about the offense |
18 | Las Vegas | 71 | 91 | Ontiveros was a nice add, so improvement is possible |
19 | Colorado Springs | 74 | 88 | Management is confident in improvement this season |
20 | Durham | 69 | 93 | It's a tough division, but they did improve their pitching |
21 | Austin | 82 | 80 | A lot of roster movement, so we'll see how it works out |
22 | Ottawa | 83 | 79 | Lost some pieces, but they still a solid pitching staff |
23 | Trenton | 77 | 85 | Middle of the pack last season, so we'll see about them |
24 | Jacksonville | 74 | 88 | New ownership is still getting acquainted with the team |
25 | New York | 78 | 84 | Pitching was an issue last season, we'll see if it improves |
26 | Syracuse | 77 | 85 | Pretty average across the board, can they take next step? |
27 | Texas | 80 | 82 | With star slugger Riley, so could improve this season |
28 | San Francisco | 64 | 98 | Almanzar provides needed pitching help, good offense too |
29 | Seattle | 69 | 93 | Took steps forward, can they continue upward trend? |
30 | Albuquerque | 58 | 104 | Second year owner is still making team their own |
31 | Philadelphia | 55 | 107 | A lot of youth, can they take a step forward this season? |
32 | Salem | 55 | 107 | Not sure about this team, but we think they'll be better |
Monday, July 7, 2014
topoftheworl's Top 25 Pitchers - NL
The top 25 pitchers in the NL:
Name | Team | Raw Score | |
1 | Douglas Banks | Buffalo | 3600.8 |
2 | Norman LaPorta | Houston | 3487.5 |
3 | Manuel Estrada | Houston | 3391.3 |
4 | Vic Vizcaino | Arizona | 3380.0 |
5 | Will Ogden | Dover | 3361.0 |
6 | Antonio Ishida | Buffalo | 3337.0 |
7 | Marvin Walsh | Pittsburgh | 3315.0 |
8 | Davey Torrealba | Texas | 3309.0 |
9 | Jim Goulet | Texas | 3294.5 |
10 | Dioner Ontiveros | Las Vegas | 3270.0 |
11 | Don Monahan | Dover | 3259.3 |
12 | Destin Beirne | Ottawa | 3258.3 |
13 | Dennis Saito | Syracuse | 3247.3 |
14 | Artie Stone | Arizona | 3221.0 |
15 | Terry Kramer | Los Angeles | 3203.8 |
16 | Homer Butler | Los Angeles | 3198.3 |
17 | Brent Voyles | Arizona | 3192.5 |
18 | Sid Townsend | Buffalo | 3177.5 |
19 | Bill Hermanson | Philadelphia | 3175.0 |
20 | Chief King | Pittsburgh | 3168.0 |
21 | Red Collins | Florida | 3125.0 |
22 | Billy Cooper | Houston | 3116.0 |
23 | Fausto De La Rosa | Ottawa | 3115.0 |
24 | Houston Austin | Los Angeles | 3109.0 |
25 | Clarence Poole | Houston | 3104.8 |
topoftheworl's Top 25 Hitters - NL
Now its the NL's turn. First the top 25 hitters:
Projected | |||
Name | Team | RC | |
1 | Willie Cerda | Jacksonville | 127.4 |
2 | Pascual Hernandez | Houston | 126.6 |
3 | Howard Greer | Pittsburgh | 122.3 |
4 | Garrett Patrick | Dover | 121.0 |
5 | Jerrod Griffiths | Houston | 119.8 |
6 | Hootie Cookson | Dover | 119.8 |
7 | Greg Riley | Texas | 119.7 |
8 | Vic Crowe | Ottawa | 119.6 |
9 | Abraham Tannehill | Syracuse | 118.2 |
10 | Albert Pineda | Dover | 116.3 |
11 | Albert Pineda | Buffalo | 115.2 |
12 | Will Maxwell | Houston | 112.8 |
13 | Dustan Jackson | Houston | 112.3 |
14 | Benito Acosta | Buffalo | 111.4 |
15 | Pepe Guillen | Ottawa | 111.2 |
16 | Carlos Trevino | Jacksonville | 110.9 |
17 | Aurelio Lima | Syracuse | 110.8 |
18 | Tony Hujimoto | Arizona | 109.6 |
19 | Luis Duran | Salt Lake City | 108.0 |
20 | Stan Dickens | Dover | 107.9 |
21 | Alex Mercedes | Salt Lake City | 106.1 |
22 | Benny Franco | Ottawa | 106.0 |
23 | Gary Harvey | Florida | 105.8 |
24 | Victor Guzman | Arizona | 105.4 |
25 | Vic Castro | Arizona | 104.3 |
topoftheworl's Top 25 Pitchers - AL
Top 25 AL pitchers. Stamina was not given any weight in this assessment so RP's are right in there with SP's. The "raw score" is just a ranking tool and does not equate to anything specific.
Name | Team | Raw Score | |
1 | Tony Mota | St. Louis | 3479.25 |
2 | Jayson Klesko | Boston | 3419 |
3 | Trevor McQuillan | Salem | 3394.5 |
4 | Aneury Tejeda | Atlanta | 3345.75 |
5 | Thomas Hutchinson | Atlanta | 3344 |
6 | Victor Almanzar | San Francisco | 3339 |
7 | Ron Jefferson | Boston | 3307.25 |
8 | Allen Cox | Louisville | 3284 |
9 | Miguel Colon | Trenton | 3260 |
10 | Alex Satou | Pawtucket | 3258.25 |
11 | Clinton McNeil | Durham | 3243.5 |
12 | Yeico Oliva | Boston | 3228.5 |
13 | Julio Sanchez | Tampa Bay | 3228.25 |
14 | Ron Gross | Pawtucket | 3217.75 |
15 | Alberto Beltre | Pawtucket | 3213.25 |
16 | Calvin Wanatabe | Tampa Bay | 3206.25 |
17 | Gus Masaoka | Atlanta | 3205 |
18 | James Haselman | Tampa Bay | 3177.5 |
19 | Walt White | Charlotte | 3164.25 |
20 | Antone O'Neill | St. Louis | 3164 |
21 | Edgard Fernandez | Albuquerque | 3161 |
22 | Lloyd Chiasson | San Juan | 3151.5 |
23 | Kevin Kingland | New York | 3149 |
24 | Jhoulys Olmedo | Salem | 3143 |
25 | Hiram Ogawa | St. Louis | 3140.5 |
topoftheworl's Top 25 Hitters - AL
Here are the top 25 hitters in the AL. Pure bats, not points for defense. The second column is my estimate of their predicted runs created for the year. Home ballpark has not been figured in.
-----This just in: Albert Cruz is a BEAST!-----
-----This just in: Albert Cruz is a BEAST!-----
Projected | |||
Name | Team | RC | |
1 | Albert Cruz | Pawtucket | 134.7 |
2 | Timothy Steinbach | Atlanta | 121.4 |
3 | Enrique Garces | Atlanta | 120.8 |
4 | Mendy Kondou | Boston | 120.3 |
5 | Morgan Cerda | Atlanta | 120 |
6 | Eugene Brantley | Tampa Bay | 117.5 |
7 | Kendry Lunar | Boston | 114.4 |
8 | Vic Park | Atlanta | 113.6 |
9 | Crash Meacham | Atlanta | 113.2 |
10 | Benjamin Delcarmen | Cincinnati | 111.8 |
11 | Vladimir Troncoso | San Juan | 111.6 |
12 | Neifi Gandarillas | Louisville | 111.5 |
13 | Junior Roberts | Charlotte | 111 |
14 | Alex Manto | Atlanta | 109.4 |
15 | Joshua Hendrick | San Juan | 109.2 |
16 | Theo Waters | Pawtucket | 108.3 |
17 | Stubby Shaw | Boston | 107.7 |
18 | Takumi Tanaka | Salem | 106.3 |
19 | Joey Ryan | Louisville | 105.8 |
20 | Joe Foster | San Juan | 104.6 |
21 | Vern Connelly | Louisville | 103.6 |
22 | Vinny Dickinson | Atlanta | 103.1 |
23 | James Dillard | Charlotte | 101.6 |
24 | Yuniesky Nieves | San Juan | 101.3 |
25 | Brutus Henry | St. Louis | 101.1 |
topoftheworl's Future Rankings
Future rankings
Since I am in the middle of a rebuild I decided to see how I am coming along. I took every player at every level and scored all of them 25 or under. This is a flawed system, of course, because my advanced scouting sucks. However, in theory my advanced scouting should be inaccurate in a way that does not bias any one player or team. I broke up prospects into 5 tiers. Tire one are the truly elite and tier 5 probably should never make the majors. Teams got the most points for a Tier 1 players and a tiny amount for a tier 4 prospect (with nothing for tier 5). I did not make a distinction between ML and minors since we all run our teams differently. The total points don't mean anything except giving me a final way to rank teams.
Thoughts: No tears for Dover since they have won back-to-back. SF and Buffalo are projected to make the playoffs. Atlanta is 11th and the 2nd best team overall in my projections.
Since I am in the middle of a rebuild I decided to see how I am coming along. I took every player at every level and scored all of them 25 or under. This is a flawed system, of course, because my advanced scouting sucks. However, in theory my advanced scouting should be inaccurate in a way that does not bias any one player or team. I broke up prospects into 5 tiers. Tire one are the truly elite and tier 5 probably should never make the majors. Teams got the most points for a Tier 1 players and a tiny amount for a tier 4 prospect (with nothing for tier 5). I did not make a distinction between ML and minors since we all run our teams differently. The total points don't mean anything except giving me a final way to rank teams.
Rank | Team | Total Points |
1 | San Francisco | 18 |
1 | Austin | 18 |
1 | Buffalo | 18 |
4 | Colorado Springs | 17.5 |
4 | New York | 17.5 |
6 | Salt Lake City | 17 |
7 | San Juan | 16.5 |
8 | Florida | 14.5 |
9 | Jacksonville | 12 |
9 | Las Vegas | 12 |
11 | Atlanta | 11 |
12 | Salem | 10.5 |
12 | Cincinnati | 10.5 |
12 | Seattle | 10.5 |
15 | Trenton | 10 |
16 | Arizona | 9.5 |
17 | Charlotte | 9 |
18 | Albuquerque | 8 |
18 | Durham | 8 |
20 | Syracuse | 7.5 |
21 | Texas | 6.5 |
22 | Ottawa | 6 |
22 | Philadelphia | 6 |
24 | Houston | 5.5 |
24 | St. Louis | 5.5 |
26 | Boston | 3.5 |
26 | Los Angeles | 3.5 |
28 | Louisville | 3 |
28 | Pawtucket | 3 |
28 | Tampa Bay | 3 |
31 | Pittsburgh | 2 |
32 | Dover | 1.5 |
Thoughts: No tears for Dover since they have won back-to-back. SF and Buffalo are projected to make the playoffs. Atlanta is 11th and the 2nd best team overall in my projections.
topoftheworl's Season 24 Preview
I had a little extra time this last week (Barrow, AK, my home, shuts down for a local holiday on the 2nd so we all had a 5 day weekend) and the wife and kids are out of town. Rather than do something useful I broke out an old spreadsheet I had and put Cobbfather's 32 teams into it. I used to do the blog over in Long Haul and I used it then. I asked A-log if I could share my results and the fruit of my efforts is below. I'll start by giving the caveat that it is really hard to quantify defense into a formula and so while I try, its probably undervalued in my final product.
Projected AL records:
My thoughts: If this holds I will owe ploppie a season since I promised 76 wins. I ran Tampa Bay twice because I didn't believe how poorly they did. San Francisco is a team to watch. Not only are they the class of the West now, but they are only getting better (more on that later). Atlanta has the best offense and the 2nd best pitching. Boston has the best pitching and the 2nd best hitting. One of them will not win their division ;) Trenton projects to have a run differential of 0. I've never had that happen before.
Projected NL records:
My thoughts: Houston is really, really good. Their pitching staff is projected to be 20 runs better than LA's and 60 runs better than anyone else. In addition they have the 2nd best offense. Their run differential is projected to be bigger than Dover's and Arizona's combined. Texas is real trouble on offense. Buffalo is the San Francisco of the NL, but better. They should make the playoffs this season and they are only getting better.
Projected AL records:
AL North | W | Ḷ | GB |
Pawtucket
|
90 | 72 | - |
St. Louis | 86 | 76 | 4 |
Cincinnati
|
79 | 83 | 11 |
New York | 69 | 93 | 22 |
AL East
|
W | Ḷ | GB |
Atlanta | 111 | 51 | - |
Boston
|
100 | 62 | 11 |
Trenton
|
81 | 81 | 30 |
Durham | 71 | 91 | 39 |
AL South
|
W | Ḷ | GB |
San Juan | 92 | 70 | - |
Charlotte
|
85 | 77 | 7 |
Louisville | 76 | 86 | 16 |
Tampa Bay | 75 | 87 | 17 |
AL West
|
W | Ḷ | GB |
San Francisco
|
76 | 86 | - |
Colorado Springs
|
73 | 89 | 3 |
Albuquerque | 66 | 96 | 9 |
Salem | 65 | 97 | 10 |
My thoughts: If this holds I will owe ploppie a season since I promised 76 wins. I ran Tampa Bay twice because I didn't believe how poorly they did. San Francisco is a team to watch. Not only are they the class of the West now, but they are only getting better (more on that later). Atlanta has the best offense and the 2nd best pitching. Boston has the best pitching and the 2nd best hitting. One of them will not win their division ;) Trenton projects to have a run differential of 0. I've never had that happen before.
Projected NL records:
NL North |
W
|
Ḷ | GB |
Ottawa
|
87 | 75 | - |
Pittsburgh
|
83 | 79 | 4 |
Syracuse
|
78 | 84 | 8 |
Seattle
|
72 | 90 | 15 |
NL East
|
W
|
Ḷ | GB |
Dover
|
95 | 67 | - |
Buffalo
|
86 | 76 | 9 |
Florida
|
77 | 85 | 18 |
Philadelphia
|
71 | 91 | 24 |
NL South
|
W | Ḷ | GB |
Houston
|
107 | 55 | - |
Jacksonville
|
81 | 81 | 26 |
Austin
|
73 | 89 | 34 |
Texas
|
60 | 102 | 47 |
NL West
|
W | Ḷ | GB |
Arizona
|
91 | 71 | - |
Los Angeles
|
80 | 82 | 11 |
Salt Lake City
|
79 | 83 | 12 |
Las Vegas
|
78 | 84 | 13 |
My thoughts: Houston is really, really good. Their pitching staff is projected to be 20 runs better than LA's and 60 runs better than anyone else. In addition they have the 2nd best offense. Their run differential is projected to be bigger than Dover's and Arizona's combined. Texas is real trouble on offense. Buffalo is the San Francisco of the NL, but better. They should make the playoffs this season and they are only getting better.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)