Team | W | L | PREV | Comments | |
1 | Dover | 61 | 27 | 2 | Takes over the top spot, as they've been on fire lately |
2 | Little Rock | 54 | 34 | 1 | Still extremely solid all around and playing well |
3 | Colorado Springs | 54 | 34 | 4 | High numbers across the board, very solid team |
4 | Buffalo | 51 | 37 | 5 | Playing well, although offense has fallen off a bit |
5 | Tampa Bay | 51 | 37 | 8 | Pitching has been better, and offense has been solid |
6 | Texas | 52 | 36 | 21 | Playing fantastic since last rankings, improved all around |
7 | Detroit | 45 | 43 | 9 | Solid team, numbers say record should be better |
8 | Vancouver | 46 | 42 | 13 | The champs are hanging in there, don't count them out |
9 | Boston | 48 | 40 | 7 | Pitching has been roughed up as of late, needs to improve |
10 | Minnesota | 52 | 36 | 3 | Major all around decrease in production since last rankings |
11 | Pittsburgh | 53 | 35 | 6 | Pitching is keeping them in it, not getting much offense at all |
12 | Atlanta | 46 | 42 | 16 | Really coming around due to solid young players |
13 | Helena | 42 | 46 | 25 | Great since the last rankings, pitching is getting it together |
14 | Los Angeles | 43 | 45 | 24 | Playing well, offense is improving, pitching is lights out |
15 | Kansas City | 47 | 41 | 12 | Hanging in there, but pitching has been really bad. |
16 | Austin | 45 | 43 | 18 | Need to get something going on offense to get back in it |
17 | Boise | 43 | 45 | 26 | Bounced back a bit since the last rankings |
18 | Cleveland | 46 | 42 | 19 | Getting it done, but the numbers are a bit low all around |
19 | Omaha | 45 | 43 | 14 | Pitching hasn't been great as of late |
20 | Charlotte | 45 | 43 | 10 | Numbers down all around, but could bounce back |
21 | New York | 42 | 46 | 17 | Playing just decent so far, but not amongst the elite |
22 | St. Louis | 41 | 47 | 15 | Offense dropped off a lot since last rankings |
23 | Burlington | 40 | 48 | 23 | Even though pitching improved, offense is just average |
24 | El Paso | 36 | 52 | 22 | Pretty much middle of the road across the board |
25 | Syracuse | 41 | 47 | 20 | Rough stretch since the last rankings, should bounce back |
26 | Durham | 40 | 48 | 11 | Really bad since last rankings, pitching fell off and bats cold |
27 | Honolulu | 39 | 49 | 28 | New owner aboard, offense is better, but pitching struggling |
28 | Philadelphia | 36 | 52 | 31 | Majorly improved pitching, but offense is still lacking |
29 | Colorado | 32 | 56 | 27 | Has the worse team ERA I've ever seen, but good bats |
30 | Seattle | 35 | 53 | 29 | Numbers improving, but not yet in the win column |
31 | Florida | 31 | 57 | 30 | Numbers not horrible, but has yet to break through |
32 | Washington | 26 | 62 | 32 | Numbers improved, but not enough to move up |
Monday, July 15, 2013
Season 20 Power Rankings # 2
It's time for another edition of the power rankings! And yes, there is a new number 1! Since the last rankings, Dover has been on fire, establishing themselves as the league's top team. Little Rock is still a strong # 2, even though they dropped out of the top spot. Other highlights include a big jump for Texas vaulting from #21 all the way up to #6 with a solid run since the last rankings. Overall though, the top of the rankings remained relatively stable. Without further adieu, here are the complete rankings!
Tuesday, July 2, 2013
Season 20 Power Rankings # 1
Season 20 is well under way, and it's time for the first edition of the power rankings! So far, it seems like this is a repeat of Season 19 in many ways. Vancouver is the preseason #1, and then struggles out of the gate and takes a tumble, to be replaced at the top by Little Rock, your #1 team, just like last season! It's almost eerie, but Little Rock's combination of solid pitching and the league's top offense puts them atop the rankings. However, there are a lot of teams nipping at the heels, and it will be interesting to see if it continues to play out like last season, or if a new path will be set. Here are the complete rankings:
Team | W | L | PREV | Comments | |
1 | Little Rock | 34 | 19 | 4 | Also made #1 in the 1st rankings last season, solid squad |
2 | Dover | 33 | 20 | 5 | Pitching has been much better this season |
3 | Minnesota | 37 | 16 | 11 | Great squad, but offense is not quite amongst elite |
4 | Colorado Springs | 35 | 18 | 7 | The bats have been getting it done so far |
5 | Buffalo | 31 | 22 | 2 | This team is incredibly solid across the board. |
6 | Pittsburgh | 36 | 17 | 3 | Getting it done with the league's top pitching staff. |
7 | Boston | 31 | 22 | 9 | Offense has been firing, pitching is just average |
8 | Tampa Bay | 31 | 22 | 6 | Haselman led staff is only middle of the pack |
9 | Detroit | 28 | 25 | 12 | Excellent pitching, and the offense is good enough. |
10 | Charlotte | 29 | 24 | 27 | Huge jump here, doing well with both pitching and offense |
11 | Durham | 28 | 25 | 10 | They are hanging in there, good but not great overall so far |
12 | Kansas City | 29 | 24 | 8 | Pitching has been roughed up so far, offense is solid |
13 | Vancouver | 27 | 26 | 1 | Typical opening season slump, they'll bounce back. |
14 | Omaha | 28 | 25 | 21 | Numbers about what you'd guess for Omaha |
15 | St. Louis | 25 | 28 | 22 | Pretty much average across the board right now |
16 | Atlanta | 25 | 28 | 16 | Showing signs of improvement, and will only get better |
17 | New York | 26 | 27 | 25 | Doing fairly well, pitching has been good |
18 | Austin | 26 | 27 | 20 | Pitching is one of the tops in the league, but little offense |
19 | Cleveland | 27 | 26 | 17 | Holding their own, but nothing spectacular about their play |
20 | Syracuse | 27 | 26 | 19 | Numbers are pretty much middle of the road |
21 | Texas | 27 | 26 | 30 | Improved pitching, but offense isn't there even in their park |
22 | El Paso | 20 | 33 | 13 | Numbers say their record should be better, bad luck so far |
23 | Burlington | 24 | 29 | 15 | Pitching has not been good, which is why they've struggled |
24 | Los Angeles | 19 | 34 | 14 | Elite pitching, with no offense, but they should improve |
25 | Helena | 20 | 33 | 23 | Pitching has been a major weakness this season |
26 | Boise | 23 | 30 | 18 | Surprised to see them struggling this much so far |
27 | Colorado | 19 | 34 | 31 | They're pitching staff has been killed, but good offense |
28 | Honolulu | 25 | 28 | 26 | Pitching has struggled so far, and offense has been sparse |
29 | Seattle | 21 | 32 | 29 | Pitching has been bad, especially given their home park |
30 | Florida | 20 | 33 | 28 | Still struggling, thought they might turn a corner this season |
31 | Philadelphia | 20 | 33 | 24 | Offense has been struggling, pitching has been mediocre |
32 | Washington | 17 | 36 | 32 | Atrocious pitching so far, and offense hasn't done much |
Sunday, June 9, 2013
Season 20 Preseason Power Rankings
Season 20 will be starting very shortly, and it's time to take a look at the preseason power rankings. Last season there was a great deal of parity at the top with a different #1 every edition of the rankings. In the end it was the preseason #1 Vancouver that took the title. Will the same hold true this year? Will new contenders emerge? A season full of questions lies ahead, but we've done our best to rank the teams going into the season. Enjoy!
Season 19 | ||||
Team | W | L | Comments | |
1 | Vancouver | 94 | 68 | Hard to go against the back-to-back champs |
2 | Buffalo | 105 | 57 | Best record in the world last season, great pitching |
3 | Pittsburgh | 102 | 60 | 100+ wins each of the last 2 seasons |
4 | Little Rock | 92 | 70 | Put up incredible numbers last season |
5 | Dover | 96 | 66 | Lost in the Series, can they take the next step? |
6 | Tampa Bay | 88 | 74 | Haselman plus a nice offense, always tough to beat |
7 | Colorado Springs | 91 | 71 | Shored up the bullpen with Camilli, looking good |
8 | Kansas City | 96 | 66 | Looking pretty good with a solid roster |
9 | Boston | 93 | 69 | Offense will be solid, pitching will be key |
10 | Durham | 93 | 69 | Looking like a very balanced team, should be solid |
11 | Minnesota | 86 | 76 | Made some good acquisitions this offseason |
12 | Detroit | 85 | 77 | Added SS Borders, will it propel them to the next level? |
13 | El Paso | 87 | 75 | Looking very balanced and should contend |
14 | Los Angeles | 85 | 77 | Pitching is tremendous, will the offense come through? |
15 | Burlington | 84 | 78 | Made big strides last season, and should continue |
16 | Atlanta | 69 | 93 | Cerda was won 2 MVPs and they have solid prospects |
17 | Cleveland | 87 | 75 | Pitching is the big question mark for this team |
18 | Boise | 87 | 75 | Looked great at times last season, but inconsistent |
19 | Syracuse | 75 | 87 | Active in FA market, is this the season it comes together? |
20 | Austin | 78 | 84 | Offense will need to pick it up to contend |
21 | Omaha | 78 | 84 | The bats are question mark for this squad as well |
22 | St. Louis | 75 | 87 | Decent squad, wasn't able to put it together last season |
23 | Helena | 74 | 88 | Good offense, can the pitching step up? |
24 | Philadelphia | 74 | 88 | Offense was a bit sub-par last season, will they improve? |
25 | New York | 73 | 89 | Just so-so last season, we'll see if they break out |
26 | Honolulu | 75 | 87 | Pitching was an issue last season |
27 | Charlotte | 72 | 90 | Team is improving, wouldn't be surprised if they move up |
28 | Florida | 67 | 95 | Maybe they can get some help on offense from the minors |
29 | Seattle | 68 | 94 | Came on at the end of last season, will it continue? |
30 | Texas | 65 | 97 | Pitching was a problem for them, may be a season away |
31 | Colorado | 48 | 114 | Pitching got destroyed last season, we'll see what they do |
32 | Washington | 50 | 112 | Not moving in a positive direction, unless owner steps up |
Saturday, June 1, 2013
Season 20 Free Agency Preview
Season 20 is under way, and the offseason free agency period is upon us. Last season, free agency featured a number of multiple time Cy Young award winners and impact bats. This season, the quality is a little bit down, probably a C grade Free Agent class. Nonetheless, we'll still give you our opinion of the top 10 free agents in this year's class. Enjoy!
Almanzar is a bit past his prime, but would make a nice one year hold over for a team looking for a slugger for just this
year. He still gets it done against
lefties, and is good against righties too, with a solid batting eye, and still
has some power left as well.
1. Charlie Borders, 30, SS
Type A Free Agent
Key Stat: 35+ HR
each of the last 4 seasons
Possible Destinations: El Paso, Durham, Austin, Minnesota
Salary Over/Under: 4
years, $65 million
Signed with Detroit - 5 years, $80 million
Signed with Detroit - 5 years, $80 million
Granted he was playing in hitter friendly Durham, but
Borders power numbers over the past several seasons are impressive. What gives him the #1 spot (albeit in a fairly
weak FA class) is his across the board 80+ fielding ratings. He can play a passable, although not great
SS. Given his age, this may only be
possible for 2-3 more seasons, but after that he’ll still be a great 3B. Borders will definitely boost the lineup
wherever he lands.
2. Jo-jo Strickland, 31, SP
Type A Free Agent
Key Stat: 3.70
Career ERA
Possible Destinations: Vancouver, Boston, Detroit, Colorado
Salary Over/Under: 4 years, $50 million
Signed with Cleveland - 5 years, $53 million
Signed with Cleveland - 5 years, $53 million
Although not as impressive as last year’s top Free Agent
starting pitchers, many of whom had won multiple Cy Young awards, Strickland is
still solid as this season’s top SP free agent.
He’s pretty strong across the board, although his splits aren’t
elite. He’ll still be a nice add for
whoever signs him, although he won’t have the impact that some of last season’s
free agent hurlers. He project him to be
a nice #3 starter.
3. Stubby Shaw, 29, 1B
Type A Free Agent
Key Stat: 30+ HR
100+ RBI each of the last 4 seasons
Possible Destinations: El Paso, Los Angeles, Syracuse,
Minnesota
Salary Over/Under: 4 years, $40 million
Signed with Boston - 5 years, $97.5 million
Signed with Boston - 5 years, $97.5 million
Shaw is a great slugger with a keen batting eye, and should
bolster the lineup wherever he lands. We
have him listed as a 1B, but could play LF or RF as well in a pinch. Wherever he plays, he’ll get on a base a ton
and hit a nice number of homers, as his past history indicates. At only age 29, he still has several great
years ahead.
4. Valerio Macias, 29, SP
Type B Free Agent
Key Stat: 4.04
Career ERA
Possible Destinations: Durham, Detroit, Dover, Colorado
Salary Over/Under: 3 years, $27 million
Signed with Vancouver - 5 years, $73 million
Signed with Vancouver - 5 years, $73 million
Macias is an interesting free agent, to say the least. He never has really been given the chance to
start full time, probably because of suspect stamina. He’s probably only good for 160 or so innings
per season, but if you have a strong bullpen, Macias can help your
rotation. At age 29, he shouldn’t
decline any time soon, and has nice, although not elite, ratings across the
board.
5. Edgar Castro, 28, 3B
Type A Free Agent
Key Stat: 20+ HR
each of the last 5 seasons
Possible Destinations: Colorado, Pittsburgh, Texas,
Cleveland
Salary Over/Under: 4 years, $42 million
Signed with Colorado - 3 years, $15.6 million
Signed with Colorado - 3 years, $15.6 million
Castro is only a decent hitter, more so against lefties than
righties, but his value lies in his great fielding ability and his age. At only 28, he’ll maintain his ratings for
several more seasons, providing a decent bat and excellent
fielding ability. Locking down a plus
fielding 3B that can hit 20 homers a season will be a nice coup for the team
that signs him.
6. Arthur Camilli, 34, RP
Type A Free Agent
Key Stat: 3.33
Career ERA
Possible Destinations: Vancouver, Colorado Springs, Dover,
Pittsburgh
Salary Over/Under: 3 years, $33 million
Signed with Colorado Springs - 5 years, $40.5 million
Signed with Colorado Springs - 5 years, $40.5 million
Camilli is a lights out reliever capable of throwing 100+
IPs with his excellent durability. It’s
hard to pinpoint any weaknesses in his arsenal, with his excellent control,
splits and pitch make-up. He should
still be elite for the next 3-4 seasons, given his age of 34.
7. Carlos Pena, 33, RP
Type A Free Agent
Key Stat: 3.58
Career ERA
Possible Destinations: Kansas City, El Paso, Detroit, Dover
Salary Over/Under: 3 years, $30 million
Signed with El Paso - 5 years, $35 million
Signed with El Paso - 5 years, $35 million
Pena has been a closer the past several seasons, although he
could make waves as a setup A, given his potential to throw 100+ IP a
season. His ratings are very comparable
with Camilli, you really can’t go wrong with either one. Again, he does not have many weaknesses to
speak of, and will definitely make any bullpen stronger.
8. Yorvit Ortiz, 31, DH/C
No Designation
Key Stat: .872
career OPS
Possible Destinations: Boston, Burlington, New York,
Cleveland
Salary Over/Under: 2 years, $13 million
Signed with Minnesota - 3 years, $14.7 million
Signed with Minnesota - 3 years, $14.7 million
Ortiz has done well the past several seasons in a part time
role, and looks as if he could maintain similar numbers as a full time
player. He has excellent contact, good
splits and an elite batting eye to go with some power. He could player catcher in a pinch, but is
probably more suited for DH. Still, he
should be a solid one if that is a need.
9. Sammy Nelson, 32, C
Type A Free Agent
Key Stat: 40+ HR
4 out of the last 5 seasons
Possible Destinations: Philadelphia, Los Angeles, Syracuse,
Texas
Salary Over/Under: 2 years, $12 million
Signed with Syracuse - 3 years, $11.8 million
Signed with Syracuse - 3 years, $11.8 million
Nelson is more of a pure power hitter than Ortiz, but doesn’t
have the same level of batting eye or contact.
His numbers are impressive, nonetheless.
Last season was the first in the last five he hasn’t slugged 40 homers, and
even though he is in the latter stages of his career, he still should be a
powerful slugger for a few more, and can play some catcher if need be.
10. Jumbo Almanzar, 34, LF
Type B Free Agent
Key Stat: .879
career OPS
Possible Destinations: Boston, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh,
Burlington
Salary Over/Under: 1 year, $5 million
Signed with Minnesota - 2 years, $28.4 million
Signed with Minnesota - 2 years, $28.4 million
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)